波段自适应细节注入的高分五号与Sentinel-2遥感影像空谱融合
Spatial-spectral fusion based on band-adaptive detail injection for GF-5 and Sentinel-2 remote sensing images
- 2021年26卷第8期 页码:1896-1909
纸质出版日期: 2021-08-16 ,
录用日期: 2021-03-30
DOI: 10.11834/jig.200755
移动端阅览
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
纸质出版日期: 2021-08-16 ,
录用日期: 2021-03-30
移动端阅览
王海荣, 郭擎, 李安. 波段自适应细节注入的高分五号与Sentinel-2遥感影像空谱融合[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2021,26(8):1896-1909.
Hairong Wang, Qing Guo, An Li. Spatial-spectral fusion based on band-adaptive detail injection for GF-5 and Sentinel-2 remote sensing images[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2021,26(8):1896-1909.
目的
2
针对当前空谱融合方法应用到高光谱图像融合时,出现的空间细节信息提升明显但光谱失真,或者光谱保真度高但空间细节信息提升不足的问题,本文提出一种波段自适应细节注入的高分五号(GF-5)高光谱图像(30 m)与Sentinel-2多光谱图像(10 m)的遥感影像空谱融合方法。
方法
2
首先,为了解决两个多波段图像不便于直接融合的问题,提出一种波段自适应的融合策略,对多光谱图像波谱范围以外的高光谱图像波段,以相关系数为标准将待融合图像进行分组。其次,针对传统Gram-Schmidt(GS)融合方法用平均权重系数模拟低分辨率图像造成的光谱失真问题,使用最小均方误差估计计算线性拟合系数,再将拟合图像作为第1分量进行GS正变换,提升融合图像的光谱保真度。最后,为了能同时注入更多的空间细节信息,通过非下采样轮廓波变换将拟合图像、空间细节信息图像和多光谱图像的空间、光谱信息融入到重构的高空间分辨率图像中,再将其与其他GS分量一起进行逆变换,最终得到10 m分辨率的GF-5融合图像。
结果
2
通过与当前用于高光谱图像空谱融合的典型方法比较,本文方法对于受时相影响较小的城镇区域,在提升空间分辨率的同时有较好的光谱保真度,且不会出现噪点;对于受时相变化影响大的植被密集区域,本文方法融合图像有较好的清晰度和地物细节信息,且没有噪点出现。本文方法的CC(correlation coefficient)、ERGAS(erreur relative globale adimensionnelle de synthèse)和SAM(spectral angle mapper)相比于传统GS方法分别提升8%、26%和28%,表明本文方法的光谱保真度大大提高。
结论
2
本文方法的结果空间上没有噪点且光谱曲线与原始光谱曲线基本保持一致,是一种兼具高空间分辨率和高光谱保真度的高光谱图像融合方法。
Objective
2
GaoFen-5 (GF-5) hyperspectral data are important hyperspectral data sources at present. However
its 30 m spatial resolution limits its extensive application. Spatial-spectral fusion can fully utilize data of high spatial resolution like multispectral image (MSI) and data of high spectral resolution like hyperspectral image (HSI). It aims to generate data with high spatial and spectral resolutions at the same time. The ratio of spatial resolution between the two fusion images is usually 4. The Sentinel-2 MSI
which is 10 m resolution
is moderate for fusion with GF-5 HSI. Some scholars have applied a few typical pan-sharpening methods for MSI and HSI fusion based on artificial dataset
such as component substitution and multiresolution analysis methods. Others have adopted some model-based algorithms
such as Bayesian and matrix factorization approaches. However
the result performed on artificial dataset obeys the Wald's protocol instead of the real dataset. The main problem in the methods mentioned above is that some methods enhance the spatial information obviously but distort its spectrum
while others have high spectral fidelity but insufficient enhancement in spatial information. Therefore
we propose a new fusion algorithm called spatial-spectral fusion based on band-adaptive detail injection for GF-5 and Sentinel-2 remote sensing images to obtain the fused image with enhanced spatial resolution and high spectral fidelity. This method is based on the Gram-Schmidt (GS) transform and the nonsubsampled contourlet transform (NSCT).
Method
2
First
the band-adaptive grouping strategy is proposed to solve the difficulty in directly fusing two multi-band images. Each band of the HSI is grouped into the most relevant band of the MSI according to the correlation coefficient. This grouping strategy also improves the spectral fidelity of the fused image to some extent. Second
the minimizing mean square error estimator is used to calculate the coefficient for generating the low-resolution MSI (LMSI) in GS transform
which reduces the spectral distortion caused by simulating the LMSI with average weight coefficients in the traditional GS fusion. Then
the GS transformation is applied for the LMSI and the HSI to obtain each GS component. Third
NSCT has advantages in image denoising and enhancement
which can improve the spatial details of the fused image. NSCT is applied on the MSI
the LMSI
and the detail image generated from their difference to obtain high- and low-frequency coefficients. Next
a new high-resolution MSI (HMSI) is produced using weighted strategies. The HMSI has high spatial resolution and some spectral information because the spatial and spectral information in MSI
LMSI
and detail image are integrated into the reconstructed HMSI. Finally
the first component of GS components is replaced with the HMSI
and the image of high spatial and spectral resolutions is generated through the GS inverse transformation.
Result
2
We perform experiments on the real GF-5 data and Sentinel-2 data with abundant feature types
such as buildings
roads
mountains
plants
water
farmland
and bare land
to verify the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed method. The standard deviation
entropy
universal image quality index
correlation coefficient (CC)
erreur relative globale adimensionnelle de Synthèse (ERGAS)
and spectral angle mapper (SAM) are used as the quantitative indices to evaluate the quality of the fusion images. Compared with the typical fusion methods
the proposed method has advantages in spatial resolution and spectral fidelity. This method can improve the spatial resolution and has good spectral fidelity for the urban area which is rarely affected by the time phase. The fused image is sharp and has no noise for the vegetation area which is greatly affected by time. Compared with the indices of the traditional GS method
the CC
ERGAS
and SAM of the proposed method are improved by 8%
26%
and 28%
respectively
which indicates that the spectral fidelity of this method is greatly improved. In addition
spectral curve is an important index to evaluate the quality of HSI. The spectral quality of the fused image is evaluated by comparing the shape and numerical difference of the spectral curve between the fused image and the original HSI in each band. The result shows that the spectral curve of the proposed method is consistent with the original HSI and closer to the original HSI than the GS method.
Conclusion
2
We propose a new spatial-spectral fusion method based on band-adaptive detail injection. No noise is observed in the result
and the spectral curve is consistent with the original spectral curve. Experimental results show that the proposed method has high spatial resolution while mitigating spectral distortion. The high- and low-frequency coefficients of NSCT in the proposed method are reorganized by the weighted fusion rule. In the following research
the NSCT fusion rule can be improved to generate fusion images with better spatial details and higher spectral fidelity.
遥感空谱融合高分五号(GF-5)Sentinel-2Gram-Schmidt(GS)变换非下采样轮廓波变换(NSCT)高光谱图像多传感器
remote sensingspatial-spectral fusionGaoFen-5 (GF-5) satelliteSentinel-2 satelliteGram-Schmidt (GS) transformnonsubsampled contourlet transform (NSCT)hyperspectral imagemulti-sensor
Dalla Mura M, Vivone G, Restaino R, Addesso P and Chanussot J. 2015. Global and local Gram-Schmidt methods for hyperspectral pansharpening//2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). Milan, Italy: IEEE: 37-40[DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325691http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325691]
Li Y Y, Sun Y J, Huang X H, Qi G Q, Zheng M Y and Zhu Z Q. 2018. An image fusion method based on sparse representation and sum modified-Laplacian in NSCT domain. Entropy, 20(7): #522[DOI: 10.3390/e20070522]
Liu Y N, Sun D X, Hu X N, Liu S F, Cao K Q, Chai M Y, Liao Q J, Zuo Z Q, Hao Z Y, Duan W B, Zhou W Y N, Zhang J and Zhang Y. 2020. Development of visible and short-wave infrared hyperspectral imager onboard GF-5 satellite. Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(4): 333-344
刘银年, 孙德新, 胡晓宁, 刘书锋, 曹开钦, 柴孟阳, 廖清君, 左志强, 郝振贻, 段微波, 周魏乙诺, 张静, 张营. 2020. 高分五号可见短波红外高光谱相机设计与研制. 遥感学报, 24(4): 333-344[DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20209196]
Loncan L, de Almeida L B, Bioucas-Dias J M, Briottet X, Chanussot J, Dobigeon N, Fabre S, Liao W Z, Licciardi G A, Simões M, Tourneret Y J, Veganzones M A, Vivone G, Wei Q and Yokoya N. 2015. Hyperspectral pansharpening: a review. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 3(3): 27-46[DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2015.2440094]
Meng F J, Song M, Guo B L, Shi R X and Shan D L. 2017. Image fusion based on object region detection and non-subsampled contourlet transform. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 62: 375-383[DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.09.019]
Meng X C, Shen H F, Li H F, Zhang L P and Fu R D. 2019. Review of the pansharpening methods for remote sensing images based on the idea of meta-analysis: practical discussion and challenges. Information Fusion, 46: 102-113[DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.05.006]
Palsson F, Sveinsson J R and Ulfarsson M O. 2017. Multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion using a 3-D-convolutional neural network. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(5): 639-643[DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2668299]
Pu R L. 2017. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Practices. New York: CRC Press: 1-6
Sun Y Z, Jiang G W, Li Y D, Yang Y, Dai H S, He J, Ye Q H, Cao Q, Dong C Z, Zhao S H and Wang W H. 2018. GF-5 satellite: overview and application prospects. Spacecraft Recovery and Remote Sensing, 39(3): 1-13
孙允珠, 蒋光伟, 李云端, 杨勇, 代海山, 何军, 叶擎昊, 曹琼, 董长哲, 赵少华, 王维和. 2018. "高分五号"卫星概况及应用前景展望. 航天返回与遥感, 39(3): 1-13[DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8518.2018.03.001]
Tong Q X, Zhang B and Zhang L F. 2016. Current progress of hyperspectral remote sensing in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5): 689-707
童庆禧, 张兵, 张立福. 2016. 中国高光谱遥感的前沿进展. 遥感学报, 20(5): 689-707[DOI: 10.11834/jrs.20166264]
Vivone G, Addesso P, Restaino R, Mura M D and Chanussot J. 2019. Pansharpening based on deconvolution for multiband filter estimation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(1): 540-553[DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2858288]
Vivone G, Alparone L, Chanussot J, Mura M D, Garzelli A, Licciardi G A, Restaino R and Wald L. 2015. A critical comparison among pansharpening algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(5): 2565-2586[DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2361734]
Vivone G, Restaino R and Chanussot J. 2018. A Bayesian procedure for full-resolution quality assessment of pansharpened products. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(8): 4820-4834[DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2839564]
Wang M, He L X, Cheng Y F and Chang X L. 2018. Panchromatic and multi-spectral fusion method combined with adaptive Gaussian filter and SFIM model. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2018, 47(1): 82-90
王密, 何鲁晓, 程宇峰, 常学立. 2018. 自适应高斯滤波与SFIM模型相结合的全色多光谱影像融合方法. 测绘学报, 47(1): 82-90[DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170421]
Xiao L, Liu P F and Li H. 2020. Progress and challenges in the fusion of multisource spatial-spectral remote sensing images. Journal of Image and Graphics, 25(5): 851-863
肖亮, 刘鹏飞, 李恒. 2020. 多源空-谱遥感图像融合方法进展与挑战. 中国图象图形学报, 25(5): 851-863 [DOI: 10.11834/jig.190620]
Xie W Y, Lei J, Cui Y H, Li Y S and Du Q. 2020. Hyperspectral pansharpening with deep priors. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 31(5): 1529-1543[DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2920857]
Yang J X, Zhao Y Q and Chan J C W. 2018. Hyperspectral and multispectral image fusion via deep two-branches convolutional neural network. Remote Sensing, 10(5): #800[DOI: 10.3390/rs10050800]
Yokoya N, Grohnfeldt C and Chanussot J. 2017. Hyperspectral and multispectral data fusion: a comparative review of the recent literature. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 5(2): 29-56[DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2016.2637824]
Zhang K, Wang M, Yang S Y, Xing Y H and Qu R. 2016. Fusion of panchromatic and multispectral images via coupled sparse non-negative matrix factorization. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9(12): 5740-5747[DOI:10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2475754]
相关作者
相关机构