No-reference sharpness assessment with fusion of gradient information and HVS filter
- Vol. 20, Issue 11, Pages: 1446-1452(2015)
Published Online:02 November 2015,
Published:2015
DOI: 10.11834/jig.20151103
移动端阅览

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Published Online:02 November 2015,
Published:2015
移动端阅览
目前无参考图像质量评价算法的性能存在较大的提升空间
为了提高清晰度评价技术
提出了一种基于梯度信息与HVS滤波器的无参考清晰度评价算法(GI-F)。 该算法首先利用梯度算子计算各像素点的梯度信息
再通过HVS滤波器得到加权和作为图像的清晰度指标。 在公开数据库LIVE、TID2008和CSIQ上进行的实验
GI-F与S3(Spectral and Spatial Sharpness)、CPBD(Cumulative Probability of Blur Detection)和LPC-SI(Local Phase Coherence-based Sharpness Index)相比
性能指标RMSE(Root Mean Squared Error)、PLCC(Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient)和SROCC(Spearman Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient)分别提升了20.66%、4.61%和3.33%;同时GI-F还具有更低的计算复杂度
即使与目前最好的BRISQUE(Blind/Referenceless Image Spatial QUality Evaluator)算法相比
耗时也降低了79.72%。 该算法只需耗费更少的时间即可计算出与人眼感知更加接近的客观清晰度指标
可广泛用于无参考图像情况下的清晰度指标计算场合
同时还可以通过并行计算进一步降低其计算时间。
Distortion in digital images is very common. To some extent
distorted image can affect research
such as analyzing and understanding images. In addition
the method of calculating the sharpness of an image is essential for the implementation of autofocus. Exploring its deeper mechanisms is of research importance. The performance of no-reference image quality assessment (IQA) has room for improvement. To upgrade the technology of sharpness assessment
an algorithm
which is called GI-F and is based on gradient information and human vision system (HVS) filter
is proposed. HVS is highly sensitive to gradient information. In the proposed algorithm
gradient information is first calculated using a gradient operator that researchers apply when computing image quality. Human studies in neurology also contributed to the development of other disciplines. Among visual cortex neurons
a mechanism occurs in which local excitation with higher amplitude can inhibit other impulses from global region. Therefore
HVS filter based on this characteristic is employed as a weighing function
in which the variable ranging from 0 to 1 stands for the relative impulse produced by each pixel in the picture
to obtain the sum of gradient information which represents the sharpness of image. Performance test can quantitatively evaluate different algorithms from the same perspectives
which generally include root-mean-squared error (RMSE)
Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PCC)
Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient (SROCC)
and time cost. To supplement
higher PCC and SROCC means that the score calculated using the proposed algorithm is more relevant with human vision system. Meanwhile
lower RMSE shows a smaller difference between two groups of samples. To ensure fairness of comparison among different algorithms
the test should be conducted under the same circumstance. The test is performed on public databases such as LIVE
TID2008
and CSIQ. Calculated results reveal that GI-F outperforms S3
CPBD and LPC-SI by using the metrics of RMSE
PCC and SROCC
which improved by 20.66%
4.61% and 3.33%
respectively. In addition
the proposed method has lower computational complexity
and saves 79.72% computational time
compared with the currently best algorithm
BRISQUE. The proposed algorithm
applying gradient information and HVS filter
costs less time to compute objective sharpness
which is closer to the perceptive sharpness provided in public databases. In addition
such an algorithm can be widely used in sharpness assessment when reference images cannot be provided. In autofocus camera applications
more accurate and more stable sharpness results in improved performance of GI-F compared with other methods. Meanwhile
parallel computation is considered to save additional time as well.
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621