浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
Received：19 July 2017，
Revised：2017-11-13，
Published：16 March 2018
移动端阅览
目的
2
热带气旋（TC）是生成于热带或副热带洋面上的强烈天气系统。在TC的监测分析和预报工作中，准确地确定其中心实时地理位置至关重要。此外，TC的精确位置也是TC强度估计的重要参数。对此，提出一种利用偏差角方差定位TC中心的方法。
方法
2
首先，从红外卫星云图中截取热带气旋主体云系区域，并分别利用Bezier直方图和K均值聚类方法分割得到主体云系二值图像和红外亮温变化剧烈位置二值图像。其中，主体云系二值图像可将TC的主体云系从卫星红外云图中分割提取出来，用割提取出来的图像进行定位可以剔除掉外散环流的小云块对定位结果的影响；而红外亮温变化剧烈位置二值图像则可分别将TC中心密闭云区，螺旋云带和外散环流的边缘及梯度较大区域分割出来，这些区域是最后TC中心定位的主要依据。将上述两幅二值图像相与得到气旋主体云系红外亮温变化剧烈位置的二值图像，这一步剔除了TC的外散环流，而得到的二值图像便可分别将TC中心密闭云区和螺旋云带的边缘及梯度较大的区域分割出来。然后，对得到的气旋主体云系红外亮温变化剧烈位置二值图像进行Hough变换检测以减小气旋中心的搜索范围。最后，以检测区域内每个像素点为参考中心计算得到偏差角矩阵，并计算偏差角矩阵的方差填入对应检测区域内作为参考中心像素点的位置得到方差矩阵，将方差矩阵中值最小的位置作为气旋中心。因为TC除了少数特别强的时候大多数可以用圆形描述，而绝大多数时候TC要用螺旋线描述，但是具体是几度螺旋线来描述合适很难确定，本文用偏差角的方差就可以衡量这些云带、边缘的偏离状况是否集中，方差越小就表示偏离状况越集中。
结果
2
运用该方法对400幅无眼TC红外图像和197幅有眼TC红外图像进行中心定位，分别与中国气象局（CMA）、日本气象厅（JMA）和美国台风预警中心（JTWC）的主观定位结果进行比较并取平均偏差，本文方法对有眼TC定位平均偏差约为27 km，无眼TC平均偏差约为45 km。具体到分别与CMA、JMA和JTWC的比较，对于有眼TC定位偏差分别为26.82 km，26.05 km和27.84 km，无眼TC定位偏差为45.84 km，44.84 km和47.15 km。
结论
2
就结果而言，本文方法定位与CMA、JMA的偏差比较接近，与JTWC的偏差较大。就西北太平洋的TC而言，CMA和JMA的定位精度较高，JTWC精度稍低，这是与认知相符合，并且也证明了本文方法具有较高的可信度。此外，本文方法为TC定位提供了新的参考依据。
Objective
2
A tropical cyclone (TC) is a strong weather system generated in tropical or subtropical surfaces. In the analysis and forecasting of TC
accurately determining the real-time location of its center accurately is important. The precise location of TC is an important parameter of TC strength estimation. This paper presents a new method for locating the center of TC with deviation angle variance.
Method
2
First
an area of interest is selected from an infrared satellite cloud image. On the basis of this image
the Bezier histogram segmentation method is employed to obtain the binary image of the TC core region. The core region of the TC can be extracted from the satellite infrared cloud image by the binary image of the TC core region. The influence of the small cloud block on the locating result can be removed using the extracted image. K-means clustering segmentation is used to deal with the cloud region with violent changes in infrared bright temperature. The TC edge region and the large gradient region of the TC core region
the spiral cloud band
and the discrete cloud blocks that form a circular flow can be extracted from the satellite infrared cloud image by using the binary image of the cloud region
in which infrared bright temperature changes violently. These regions are the main basis for the positioning of the TC center. The two binary images are combined to obtain a new binary image. The discrete cloud blocks were removed from the TC. The TC edge region and the large gradient region of the TC core region and spiral cloud band can be extracted from the satellite infrared cloud image using the new binary image. The resulting binary image is detected by the Hough transform approach to reduce the search range of the center position of the TC. Finally
the deviation angle matrix is calculated from each pixel in the detection area as the reference center. The variance matrix is obtained by calculating the variance of the deviation angle matrix and filling it in the corresponding reference center pixel point of the detection area. The minimum value position of the variance matrix is taken as the corresponding TC center position. The TC can be described in circles except in a few special cases. The TC is described as spiral most of the time. However
exact identification of the appropriate number degrees of the spiral. The variance of the deviation angle matrix can be used to measure whether these cloud bands and edges are concentrated or not. A small variance corresponds to a concentrated deviation
that is
a small variance corresponds to a high concentration of bias of the TC toward a definite spiral angle.
Result
2
In contrast to the center position issued by China Meteorological Administration (CMA)
the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)
and the US Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC)
the average location deviation of the eyed (no-eye) TC determined by the new method is approximately 27 km (45 km). Specific to CMA
JMA
and JTWC
the location deviation of the eyed (no-eye) TC determined by the new method is 26.82 (45.84)
26.05 (44.84)
and 27.84 km (47.15 km)
respectively.
Conclusion
2
The location deviation of JTWC is greater than that of CMA and JMA. In the case of TCs in the northwest Pacific
the positioning accuracy of CMA and JMA is slightly higher than that of JTWC
which is consistent with cognition. This finding proves that this method has high credibility. In this regard
the new method should be valuable for future operational TC center positioning.
Jaiswal N, Kishtawal C M. Automatic determination of center of tropical cyclone in satellite-generated IR images[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2011, 8(3):460-463.[DOI:10.1109/LGRS.2010.2085418]
Chaurasia S, Kishtawal C M, Pal P K. An objective method of cyclone centre determination fromgeostationary satellite observations[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2010, 31(9):2429-2440.[DOI:10.1080/01431160903012457]
Rao B M, Kishtwal C M, Pal P K, et al. Ers-1 surface wind observations over a cyclone system in the Bay of Bengal during November 1992[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1995, 16(2):351-357.[DOI:10.1080/01431169508954400]
Tuttle J, Gall R. A single-radar technique for estimating the winds in tropical cyclones[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1999, 80(4):653-668.[DOI:10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0653:ASRTFE>2.0.CO;2]
Hasler A F, Palaniappan K, Kambhammetu C, et al. High-resolution wind fields within the inner core and eye of a mature tropical cyclone from goes 1-min images[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1998, 79(11):2483-2496.[DOI:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<2483:HRWFWT>2.0.CO;2]
Liu J N K, Feng B, Wang M, et al. Tropical cyclone forecast using angle features and time warping[C]//Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings. Vancouver, BC, Canada: IEEE, 2006: 4330-4337. [ DOI:10.1109/IJCNN.2006.247009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2006.247009 ]
Wong K Y, Yip C L, Li P W. A novel algorithm for automatic tropical cyclone eye fix using Doppler radar data[J]. Meteorological Applications, 2007, 14(1):49-59.[DOI:10.1002/met.5]
Yurchak B S. Description of cloud-rain bands in a tropical cyclone by a hyperbolic-logarithmic spiral[J]. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 2007, 32(1):8-18.[DOI:10.3103/S1068373907010025]
Hawkins J D, Turk F J, Lee T F, et al. Observations of tropical cyclones with the SSMIS[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2008, 46(4):901-912.[DOI:10.1109/TGRS. 2008.915753]
Piñeros M F, Ritchie E A, Tyo J S. Objective measures of tropical cyclone structure and intensity change from remotely sensed infrared image data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2008, 46(11):3574-3580.[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2008.2000819]
Jaiswal N, Kishtawal C M. Objective detection of center of tropical cyclone in remotely sensed infrared images[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2013, 6(2):1031-1035.[DOI:10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2215016]
Jin S H, Wang S, Li X F, et al. A salient region detection and pattern matching-based algorithm for center detection of a partially covered tropical cyclone in a SAR image[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(1):280-291.[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2016.2605766]
Xu Q, Zhang G S, Li X F, et al. An automatic method for tropical cyclone center determination from SAR[C]//Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Beijing, China: IEEE, 2016: 2250-2252. [ DOI:10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729581 ]
Rodríguez-Herrera O G, Wood K M, Dolling K P, et al. Automatic tracking of pregenesis tropical disturbances within the deviation angle variance system[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2015, 12(2):254-258.[DOI:10.1109/LGRS. 2014.2334561]
Wang K, Li X J, Ge L L. Locating tropical cyclones with Integrated SAR and optical satellite imagery[C]//Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: IEEE, 2013: 1626-1629. [ DOI:10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6723103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6723103 ]
Jin M, Zhang C J, Li B. An fast approach to segment target from Infrared image[J]. Laser&Infrared, 2004, 34(3):222-224.
金梅, 张长江, 李冰.红外图像目标快速分割方法[J].激光与红外, 2004, 34(3):222-224. [DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078. 2004.03.020]
Gu R J, Ye B, Xu W B. A two-phase color quantization approach based on spectral clustering[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2007, 12(10):1922-1925.
谷瑞军, 叶宾, 须文波.基于谱聚类的两阶段颜色量化算法[J].中国图象图形学报, 2007, 12(10):1922-1925. [DOI:10.11834/jig. 20071055]
Li S M, Han G Q. Method of image region segmentation based on K-means clustering algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2008, 44(16):163-167.
李苏梅, 韩国强.基于K-均值聚类算法的图像区域分割方法[J].计算机工程与应用, 2008, 44(16):163-167. [DOI:10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2008.16.050]
Jia Y H. Digital Image Processing[M]. Wuhan:Wuhan University Press, 2003:144-146.
贾永红.数字图像处理[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2003:144-146.
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
