利用稳健非负矩阵分解实现无监督高光谱解混
Unsupervised hyperspectral unmixing based on robust non-negative matrix factorization
- 2020年25卷第4期 页码:801-812
收稿:2019-07-10,
修回:2019-10-1,
录用:2019-10-8,
纸质出版:2020-04-16
DOI: 10.11834/jig.190354
移动端阅览

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
收稿:2019-07-10,
修回:2019-10-1,
录用:2019-10-8,
纸质出版:2020-04-16
移动端阅览
目的
2
基于非负矩阵分解的高光谱图像无监督解混算法普遍存在着目标函数对噪声敏感、在低信噪比条件下端元提取和丰度估计性能不佳的缺点。因此,提出一种基于稳健非负矩阵分解的高光谱图像混合像元分解算法。
方法
2
首先在传统基于非负矩阵分解的解混算法基础上,对目标函数加以改进,用更加稳健的L
1
范数作为重建误差项,提高算法对噪声的适应能力,得到新的无监督解混目标函数。针对新目标函数的非凸特性,利用梯度下降法对端元矩阵和丰度矩阵交替迭代求解,进而完成优化求解,得到端元和丰度估计值。
结果
2
分别利用模拟和真实高光谱数据,对算法性能进行定性和定量分析。在模拟数据集中,将本文算法与具有代表性的5种无监督解混算法进行比较,相比于对比算法中最优者,本文算法在典型信噪比20 dB下,光谱角距离(spectral angle distance,SAD)增大了10.5%,信号重构误差(signal to reconstruction error,SRE)减小了9.3%;在真实数据集中,利用光谱库中的地物光谱特征验证本文算法端元提取质量,并利用真实地物分布定性分析丰度估计结果。
结论
2
提出的基于稳健非负矩阵分解的高光谱无监督解混算法,在低信噪比条件下,能够获得较好的端元提取和丰度估计精度,解混效果更好。
Objective
2
During hyperspectral remote sensing imaging
each captured pixel in the image always has mixed spectrum of several pure constituent spectra due to the low spatial resolution of hyperspectral cameras and the diversity of spectral signatures in nature scenes. The mixed pixels limit the application of hyperspectral images (HSI)
such as target detection
classification
and change detection
to a great extent. In many real-world applications
subpixel level accuracy is often required to improve the performance. Thus
the unmixing is very essential in the HSI analysis. In most scenarios
the spectral signatures in HSI
also termed endmembers
are unknown in advance. Therefore
the unmixing has to be performed in an unsupervised way
usually involving two steps
namely
endmember extraction and abundance coefficient estimation. In this study
we assume that the generation of mixed pixels in HSI is based on a linear mixing model. Moreover
the observed HSI
endmembers in the image
and the corresponding abundances are all non-negative
according to their physical meaning. In recent years
non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) based approaches has received extensive attention and become a research hotspot because of making full use of the HSI sparsity. However
existing non-negative matrix factorization-based approaches are not robust enough for noisy HSI data. The main reason is that a least square loss function
which is sensitive to noise and prone to large deviations
is always used for endmember extraction in these approaches. To overcome the drawbacks of NMF-based approaches
we can improve the robustness of the unmixing approaches by choosing a new loss function
which is robust. In this study
we utilize more robust L
1
loss function for NMF when performing the endmember extraction and proposed a novel unsupervised hyperspectral unmixing method based on robust NMF.
Method
2
To perform the unsupervised hyperspectral unmixing
with the endmembers unknown
both endmember extraction and the corresponding abundance fraction estimation are needed to be solved. The hyperspectral unmixing problem can be modeled as a NMF due to the similarity of underlying mathematical models. In real scenes
hyperspectral image data often contains noise and missing values
and objective functions used for endmember extraction in existing NMF-based approaches are sensitive to noise and prone to large deviations. Therefore
we use the L
1
norm on the reconstruction error term instead of the common L
2
norm to construct a new objective function. However
the new objective function is nonconvex. We can obtain the global optimal solution of one variable when the other is fixed. In addition
considering the nonsmooth L
1
norm term
to solve the optimization problem in the proposed unmixing approach is challenging. Thus
we propose an efficient multiplicative updating algorithm with the theory of the iterative reweighted least squares. In this way
each iteration can guarantee positive result. Finally
we can obtain the extracted endmembers and estimated abundances when iterative convergences.
Result
2
To verify the effectiveness and competitiveness of the proposed unsupervised unmixing
synthetic and real-world dataset are used in the experiments. The performance of the proposed approach is comprehensively evaluated with visual observations and quantitative measures. For quantitative comparison
three categories of evaluation indexes are used in this study. The indexes to measure the quality of the endmember extraction are the spectral angle distance (SAD) and the spectral information divergence (SID). Similarly
the performance discriminators to evaluate the accuracy of the abundance estimation are the abundance angle distance (AAD) and the abundance information divergence (AID). Moreover
the metrics to evaluate the performance of the reconstruction of spectral mixtures are the root mean square error (RMSE) and the signal to reconstruction error (SRE).With the synthetic dataset
we compare the proposed method with five representative methods. Among them
vertex component analysis (VCA) is a classic geometrical-based method and also the initialization of the proposed method. Minimum volume constrained nonnegative matrix factorization (MVCNMF)
robust collaborative NMF (RCoNMF)
and total variation regularized reweighted sparse NMF (TVWSNMF) are NMF-based approaches
and an untied denoising autoencoder with sparsity for spectral unmixing (uDAS) is deep learning-based approach. The experimental results showed that
when signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is 20 dB
the SAD (less is better) of the proposed algorithm decreased by 41.3%
43%
65.6%
10.5%
and 58.0% compared with the VCA
MVCNMF
RCoNMF
TVWSNMF
and uDAS; the SID (less is better) decreased by 68.9%
83.6%
95.5%
62.2%
and 97.0%; the AAD (less is better) decreased by 28.5%
12.5%
45.8%
8.4%
and 42.5%; the AID (less is better) decreased by 38.1%
28.7%
51.1%
17.2%
and 49.7%; the RMSE (less is better) decreased by 48.3%
31.2%
68.9%
33.5%
and 67.8%; and SRE (dB) (higher is better) increased by 23.7%
14.5%
60.0%
9.3%
and 47.3%
respectively. With the real world data set
the ability of the proposed approach to extract endmembers can be evaluated using the corresponding USGS(United States Geological Survey) library signatures. Moreover
given that the ground truth abundance maps are unknown exactly
the abundance estimation results can only be evaluated qualitatively. The experimental results demonstrated that the extracted endmembers achieved a good match with the ground truth signatures. In addition
the proposed approach achieved piecewise smooth abundance maps with high spatial consistency.
Conclusion
2
In this study
we proposed a novel NMF-based unmixing approach to perform the unsupervised hyperspectral unmixing in noisy environments. Different from the current NMF-based unmixing approaches
robust L
1
norm is used as the reconstruction error term in the objective function to improve the accuracy of the endmember extraction and abundance estimation. Compared with the state-of-the-art approaches
experimental results of synthetic data set and real world data set illustrate that the proposed approach performs well under different noise conditions
especially in low SNR.
Bioucas-Dias J M and Nascimento J M P. 2008. Hyperspectral subspace identification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(8):2435-2445[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2008.918089]
He W, Zhang H Y and Zhang L P. 2017. Total variation regularized reweighted sparse nonnegative matrix factorization for hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(7):3909-3921[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2017.2683719]
Iordache M D, Bioucas-Dias J M and Plaza A. 2012. Total variation spatial regularization for sparse hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(11):4484-4502[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2191590]
Li J, Agathos A, Zaharie D, Bioucas-Dias J M, Plaza A and Li X. 2015. Minimum volume simplex analysis:a fast algorithm for linear hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(9):5067-5082[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2015.2417162]
Li J, Bioucas-Dias J M, Plaza A and Liu L. 2016. Robust collaborative nonnegative matrix factorization for hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(10):6076-6090[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2016.2580702]
Liu S C, Bruzzone L, Bovolo F and Du P J. 2016. Unsupervised multitemporal spectral unmixing for detecting multiple changes in hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(5):2733-2748[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2015.2505183]
Miao L D and Qi H R. 2007. Endmember extraction from highly mixed data using minimum volume constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(3):765-777[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2006.888466]
Miao L D, Qi H R and Szu H. 2007. A maximum entropy approach to unsupervised mixed-pixel decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16(4):1008-1021[DOI:10.1109/TIP.2006.891350]
Nascimento J M P and Dias J M B. 2005a. Does independent component analysis play a role in unmixing hyperspectral data? IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(1):175-187[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2004.839806]
Nascimento J M P and Dias J M B. 2005b. Vertex component analysis:a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(4):898-910[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2005.844293]
Pan B, Shi Z W, Xu X, Shi T Y, Zhang N and Zhu X Z. 2019. CoinNet:copy initialization network for multispectral imagery semantic segmentation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 16(5):816-820[DOI:10.1109/LGRS.2018.2880756]
Pan Q H, Kong D G, Ding C and Luo B. 2014. Robust non-negative dictionary learning//Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Québec City, Québec, Canada: AAAI: 2027-2033
Peng Q, Zhang B, Sun X, Gao L R and Yu W B. 2017. Hyperspectral unmixing based on spatial and spectral preprocessing prior and constrained non-negative matrix factorization. Journal of Image and Graphics, 22(4):0542-0550
彭倩, 张兵, 孙旭, 高连如, 于文博. 2017.结合空间光谱预处理和约束非负矩阵分解的高光谱图像混合像元分解.中国图象图形学报, 22(4):0542-0550 [DOI:10.11834/jig.20170414]
Qu Y and Qi H R. 2019. uDAS:an untied denoising autoencoder with sparsity for spectral unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(3):1698-1712[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2018.2868690]
Rajabi R and Ghassemian H. 2015. Spectral unmixing of hyperspectral imagery using multilayer NMF. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(1):38-42[DOI:10.1109/LGRS.2014.2325874]
Swayze G, Clark R N, Kruse F, Sutley S and Gallagher A. 1992. Ground-truthing AVIRIS mineral mapping at Cuprite, Nevada//Proceedings of Summaries of the 3rd Annual JPL Airborne Geosciences Workshop. Pasadena, CA: JPL: 47-49
Winter M E. 1999. N-FINDR: an algorithm for fast autonomous spectral end-member determination in hyperspectral data//Proceedings of SPIE's International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation. Denver, CO, United States: SPIE: 266-275[ DOI:10.1117/12.366289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.366289 ]
Xu X, Shi Z W and Pan B. 2018. $${\ell _0}$$ -based sparse hyperspectral unmixing using spectral information and a multi-objectives formulation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 141:46-58[DOI:10.1016/J.ISPRSJPRS.2018.04.008]
Yuan J, Zhang Y J and Gao F P. 2018. An overview on linear hyperspectral unmixing. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 37(5):553-571
袁静, 章毓晋, 高方平. 2018.线性高光谱解混模型综述.红外与毫米波学报, 37(5):553-571 [DOI:10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2018.05.008]
Zou Z X and Shi Z W. 2016. Hierarchical suppression method for hyperspectral target detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(1):330-342[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2015.2456957]
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621