改进型DeepLab的极化SAR果园分类
Polarized SAR orchard classification based on improved DeepLab
- 2019年24卷第11期 页码:2035-2044
收稿:2019-03-20,
修回:2019-5-10,
录用:2019-5-17,
纸质出版:2019-11-16
DOI: 10.11834/jig.190094
移动端阅览

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
收稿:2019-03-20,
修回:2019-5-10,
录用:2019-5-17,
纸质出版:2019-11-16
移动端阅览
目的
2
针对农作物种植趋向集中化、机械化和庄园化的现状,高分辨率遥感影像精准识别技术已广泛应用于农作物分类。研究表明,采用先进的深度学习算法挖掘高分辨率农作物影像信息,有利于高效地分析农作物长势和参量预测,为此,提出一种改进型深度神经网络(DeepLab)的高分辨率果园遥感图像分割算法。
方法
2
首先提取原始数据的极化特征和基于相干/非相干分解的特征组成高维特征空间,然后选用流行学习降维方式获得最优3通道特征向量构成伪彩图,利用深度可分离网络(xception)、空洞卷积网络(atrous convolution)、多孔空间金字塔(ASPP)和上采样(upsample)搭建DeepLab的编码解码过程(encoder-decoder),最后将伪彩训练集和标签导入搭建的DeepLab进行训练并保存模型,利用模型对目标数据进行有效分类。
结果
2
利用本算法对中国海南某地的Ⅰ期芒果、Ⅱ期芒果、Ⅲ期芒果、槟榔、龙眼5类水果进行分类,针对不同时期的同一种水果分类错误率下降了8%左右,相比传统的果园分类算法,本算法的kappa系数提高了约0.1,总体分类精度(OA)也有一定程度的提高。
结论
2
本算法在保证不同类别水果分类准确率的基础上,提高了不同时期的同一类水果的分类准确率,在一定程度上提高了农作物长势分析的准确性,保证了高分辨率果园数据分析的可靠性。
Objective
2
With the growing national economy and the increasing demand for the quantity and quality of fruits
satisfying the degree of mastery of fruit farmers' information on large-scale orchards has been difficult for traditional field research methods. Hence
determining how to accurately obtain the same fruit types in different fruit types and different mature states in high-resolution remote sensing orchard images by using remote sensing methods and image-processing methods to obtain orchard distribution and fruit growth information in a timely and rapid manner has become a research focus. Improving the classification accuracy rate effectively is conducive to the dynamic monitoring of large-scale orchard
which has far-reaching significance for promoting the sustainable development of the Chinese fruit industry. In recent years
combining artificial intelligence collection and analysis of high-resolution crop remote sensing images to analyze crop distribution
growth
and parameters has become an important field of agricultural technology development. Sample collection
image data preprocessing
image classification
and sample analysis from crop land data are cumbersome data-mining processes. Traditional machine-learning algorithms are widely used in data-preprocessing stages and image classification. Using traditional threshold segmentation algorithms can effectively classify different fruit types
and wavelet algorithm
support vector machine algorithm
and random forest algorithm as good classifiers can greatly improve the classification accuracy. When neural networks are once again valued and deeply explored
a series of networks
such as convolutional neural networks
deep confidence networks
and adversarial networks
is applied in image classification
segmentation
and recognition. The depth-mining ability of image feature information can be used to obtain a complete feature space effectively. Data with complete feature space and label are easy to be learned by computers to obtain training models
which greatly improve classification accuracy. High-resolution remote sensing image recognition technology
which focuses on crop planting
mechanization
and manorization
has been widely used in crop classification. Using superior depth-learning algorithms to mine high-resolution crop image information is beneficial for the efficient analysis of crop growth and parameter prediction.
Method
2
Atrous convolution is more advantageous than other convolutional networks. It can mine detailed underlying feature information
but can easily cause overfitting and feature redundancy because substantial information space needs to be considered. Popular learning algorithms can effectively perform features. Preliminary classification extracts the feature space that is most conducive to deep learning classification. The depth-separable network and the porous space pyramid can be regarded as feature-encoding processes
and the upsampling process constitutes the backend decoding process. In this study
an improved deep neural network (DeepLab) high-resolution orchard remote sensing image segmentation algorithm is proposed. First
the polarization characteristics of the original data
the features based on coherent decomposition
and the features based on incoherent decomposition are used to form a high-dimensional feature space. Then
the popular learning dimension reduction method is used to obtain the optimal three-channel feature vector to form a pseudo-color map
and a depth separable network (xception)
a cavity convolution network (atrous convolution)
atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP)
and upsample are adopted to build the encoder-decoder of DeepLab. Finally
the pseudo-color training set and the label are imported into the constructed DeepLab to train and save the model
which can be used to effectively classify the target data.
Result
2
The proposed algorithm can be used to classify five types of fruits
namely
mango
phase Ⅱ mango
phase Ⅲ mango
betel nut
and longan
in a certain area of Hainan
China. The error rate of the same fruit classification for different periods decreases by approximately 8% according to the high-resolution image feature information-learning process of mango
betel nut
and longan. Compared with the traditional orchard classification algorithm
the proposed algorithm presents increased kappa coefficient by approximately 0.1 and improved overall classification accuracy to some extent. The proposed algorithm not only has considerable effects on different types of fruit classification but also a more accurate sample division effect in different periods of the same fruit.
Conclusion
2
The algorithm improves the classification accuracy of the same type of fruit in different periods on the basis of preserving the classification accuracy of different types of fruits. The accuracy of crop growth analysis is improved to a certain extent
and the reliability of high-resolution orchard data analysis is ensured. The DeepLab network is advancing to high-resolution data classification. This network can be feasibly applied to determine the status of rice development in different periods in the future because of its superiority in the analysis of different maturity states of the same species. The health of large areas of rice can be monitored.
Jiang Y, Zhang X L, Shi J. A study on classification of polarimetric SAR image by target decomposition and support vector machines[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2008, 13(8):1511-1516.
江勇, 张晓玲, 师君.基于目标分解与支持向量机的极化SAR图像分类研究[J].中国图象图形学报, 2008, 13(8):1515-1516.
Xu KJ, Tian Q J, Yue J B, et al. Forest tree species identification and its response to spatial scale based on multispectral and multi-resolution remotely sensed data[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(12):3986-3994.
徐凯健, 田庆久, 岳继博, 等.基于多光谱影像的森林树种识别及其空间尺度响应[J].应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12):3986-3994. [DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201812.011]
An R, Lu C H, Wang H L, et al. Remote sensing identification of rangeland degradation using hyperion Hyperspectral image in a typical area for Three-River headwater region, Qinghai, China[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2018, 43(3):399-405.
安如, 陆彩红, 王慧麟, 等.三江源典型区草地退化Hyperion高光谱遥感识别研究[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2018, 43(3):399-405.
He C, Li S, Liao Z X, et al. Texture classification of PolSAR data based on sparse coding of wavelet polarization textons[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(8):4576-4590.[DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2236338]
He C, Zhuo T, Ou D, et al. Nonlinear compressed sensing-based LDA topic model for polarimetric SAR image classification[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(3):972-982.[DOI:10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2293343]
Song R J, Ning J F, Chang Q R, et al. Kiwifruit orchard mapping based on wavelet textures and random forest[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(4):222-231.
宋荣杰, 宁纪锋, 常庆瑞, 等.基于小波纹理和随机森林的猕猴桃果园遥感提取[J].农业机械学报, 2018, 49(4):222-231. [DOI:10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2018.04.025]
Xu Y. Fuzzy maximum like hood estimation based on remote sensing image segmentation[J]. Geomatics&Spatial Information Technology, 2019, 42(1):163-166, 170.
徐艳.基于模糊最大似然估计算法的遥感影像分割[J].测绘与空间地理信息, 2019, 42(1):163-166, 170.
He F, Wang B B, Zhang F G, et al. Hyperspectral image classification using weighted spatial and spectral clustering with adaptive neighbors[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology:Natural Science, 2017, 40(12):1604-1609.
何芳, 王标标, 张峰干, 等.加权空-谱自适应近邻聚类的高光谱图像分类[J].合肥工业大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 40(12):1604-1609. [DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5060.2017.12.005]
Jiao W, Yang X Z, Dong Z Y, et al. Shadow detection based on FLICM clustering algorithm and color space for remote sensing images[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2018, 34(5):37-41.
焦玮, 杨学志, 董张玉, 等.结合模糊聚类与色彩空间的遥感图像阴影检测[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2018, 34(5):37-41.
Ma K, Liang M. Studies on classification of hyperspectral image based on BP neural network[J]. Geomatics&Spatial Information Technology, 2017, 40(5):118-121.
马凯, 梁敏.基于BP神经网络高光谱图像分类研究[J].测绘与空间地理信息, 2017, 40(5):118-121. [DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2017.05.037]
Wan H, Sun X, Zhou H L, et al. Study on ground objects classification by UAV hyperspectral remote sensing images based on decision tree[J]. Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 23(1):101-104, 108.
万欢, 孙昕, 周浩澜, 等.基于决策树的无人机高光谱遥感影像地物分类研究[J].河北农业科学, 2019, 23(1):101-104, 108.
Ming Q J. Identification and extraction of typical vegetation on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau based on spectral matching technique[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2017. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11415-1017126187.htm .
明群杰.基于光谱匹配技术的青藏高原典型植被识别与提取[D].北京: 中国地质大学, 2017.
Tang H, He C. SAR image scene classification with fully convolutional network and modified conditional random field-recurrent neural network[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 36(12):3436-3441.
汤浩, 何楚.全卷积网络结合改进的条件随机场-循环神经网络用于SAR图像场景分类[J].计算机应用, 2016, 36(12):3436-3441. [DOI:10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2016.12.3436]
Chollet F. Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions[C]//Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Honolulu, HI, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1800-1807.[ DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.195 ]
Xu Z G, Wang J, Wang L Y. infrared image semantic segmentation based on improved DeepLab and residual network[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control. Guiyang, China: IEEE, 2018: 1-9.[ DOI: 10.1109/ICMIC.2018.8530003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICMIC.2018.8530003 ]
Lowe D G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2):91-110.
Liu J, Zhao F Y. Research progress of dimensionality reduction technology on high-dimensional data[J]. Electronic Science and Technology, 2018, 31(3):36-38, 43.
刘靖, 赵逢禹.高维数据降维技术及研究进展[J].电子科技, 2018, 31(3):36-38, 43. [DOI:10.16180/j.cnki.issn1007-7820.2018.03.010]
Ma F M, Zhang L, Wang J B. Introduction of the dimensionality reduction algorithm[J]. Software Engineering, 2017, 20(8):7-13.
马发民, 张林, 王锦彪.维数约简算法简述[J].软件工程, 2017, 20(8):7-13.
Chen T H, Zheng S Q, Yu J C. Remote sensing image segmentation based on improved DeepLab NETWORKDeepLab[J]. Measurement&Control Technology, 2018, 37(11):34-39.
陈天华, 郑司群, 于峻川.采用改进DeepLab网络的遥感图像分割[J].测控技术, 2018, 37(11):34-39. [DOI:10.19708/j.ckjs.2018.11.008]
Deng L, Fu S S, Zhang R X. Application of deep belief network in polarimetric SAR image classification[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2016, 21(7):933-941.
邓磊, 付姗姗, 张儒侠.深度置信网络在极化SAR图像分类中的应用[J].中国图象图形学报, 2016, 21(7):933-941. [DOI:10.11834/jig.20160711]
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621