低秩和主动形状模型的肺区分割
Lung segmentation by active shape model approach based on low rank theory
- 2020年25卷第4期 页码:759-767
收稿:2019-01-14,
修回:2019-9-20,
录用:2019-9-27,
纸质出版:2020-04-16
DOI: 10.11834/jig.180659
移动端阅览

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
收稿:2019-01-14,
修回:2019-9-20,
录用:2019-9-27,
纸质出版:2020-04-16
移动端阅览
目的
2
肺区分割是肺癌计算机辅助诊断系统的首要步骤。主动形状模型(active shape model,ASM)能根据训练集获得肺区形状模型,再结合待分割肺区影像自身的局部特征,进行测试影像的分割。由于主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA)仅能去除服从高斯分布的噪声,不能处理其他类型的噪声,所以当训练集含有非高斯类型的噪声样本时,采用基于PCA的ASM无法训练出正确的形状模型,使得肺区分割不能得到正确的结果。而低秩(low rank,LR)理论的鲁棒主成分分析(robust principal component analysis,RPCA)能去除各种类型的噪声,基于此,本文提出一种将RPCA与ASM相结合的方法。
方法
2
首先对训练样本集标记点矩阵进行低秩分解,去除噪声样本对训练出的形状模型的影响。然后在ASM训练局部梯度模型时,用判断训练样本轮廓上的标记点曲率直方图的相似度来去除噪声样本。
结果
2
在训练集含噪声样本时,将基于RPCA的ASM与传统ASM(即基于PCA的ASM)分别生成的形状模型进行对比,发现基于RPCA的ASM生成的形状模型与训练集无噪声样本时传统ASM生成的形状模型更相符。在训练集含噪声样本的情况下,基于RPCA的ASM方法分割EMPIRE10数据集中的22个肺影像,与金标准的重叠度为94.5%,而基于PCA的ASM方法分割准确率仅为69.5%。
结论
2
实验结果表明,在训练样本集中有噪声样本的情况下,基于RPCA的ASM分割能得到比基于PCA的ASM更好的分割效果。
Objective
2
Computer-aided diagnosis of lung cancer is the automatic recognition of lung lesions in computed tomography (CT) images through a computer image processing technology. Given that lung lesions are located in the lung areas
the contours of lung areas should be automatically marked on lung images first. Thus
lung segmentation is the first step in the computer-aided diagnosis of lung cancer. Current segmentation methods for pulmonary parenchyma
including normal and pathological
can be divided into three categories according to visual appearance
location relationship of shape
and whether or not the method is a hybrid. Methods based on visual appearance mostly consider the lower gray values of lung areas instead of surrounding tissues. Therefore
a pathological lung (especially including interstitial lung disease) is segmented by a classifier on the basis of gray and texture features. These methods mainly introduce the anatomical relationship of the lungs with the heart
liver
spleen
and rib. Hybrid methods establishes shape models and evolves lung contours according to surface features. They can achieve good segmentation results without noise samples in training sets but does not consider the problem of noise samples in the training sets during the construction of training shape models. The active shape model (ASM) based on principal component analysis (PCA) is an outstanding method
which can only deal with Gaussian noise. ASM is a statistical deformation model and uses PCA to obtain the average shape and the allowable range of shape of a training sample set and then establishes a shape model. ASM establishes a local feature appearance model according to the training sample set. Finally
ASM evolves the contour of the test image on the basis of the local feature appearance and shape models. Robust PCA (RPCA) in low rank theory is robust to any kind of noise. In addition
the shapes of a training sample set have a low rank attribute because the anatomical shapes of the human lungs are roughly the same. Therefore
this study combined RPCA with ASM to solve the problem that the correct shape model cannot be obtained because of noise samples in training sets.
Method
2
First
a traditional method was used to segment the pulmonary region of training samples and generate lung boundary contours. The segmentation steps include extra-pulmonary region exclusion by iteration threshold and region growing segmentation methods
trachea elimination
internal cavity filling
liver elimination
and left and right lung separation. Second
we extracted 96 marker points on the left or right lung boundary contour. We assigned these marker points as
$$x $$
-coordinates and
$$y $$
-coordinates and placed them into a single matrix. Then
we aligned the lung boundary contours in the training sample set through the Procrustes analysis method. Third
we decomposed the matrix through the low rank theory into the low rank component and noise component matrices. We used the accelerated approximation gradient method to solve the decomposition and employed PCA to the low rank component matrix and obtained the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. They were used to construct the shape model
which is expressed as the average shape and deformation range. Then
we established a local feature appearance model by using gradient features and obtained a gradient-level appearance model that describes the typical image structure around each landmark from pixel profiles sampled (using linear interpolation) around each landmark perpendicular to the contour. Finally
ASM evolved the contour of the test image based on the local feature appearance and shape models. In the training of the local gradient model in ASM
the noise samples of the training set must be eliminated. In this study
the similarity of the curvature histograms of the marked points on the contours of the training samples was evaluated
and noise samples were removed.
Result
2
First
a training dataset was established. It consisted of 35 multi-slice spiral CT lung scan images collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Two scans included juxta-pleural tumor on the left side. The test dataset comprised 22 scans from EMPIRE 10 and is the gold standard for lung contours.The five scans included juxta-pleural tumor on the left side. Using the proposed method to segment the 22 lungs of EMPIRE10 database
we obtained the overlap rate with a gold standard of 94.5%. Meanwhile
the accuracy of ASM based on PCA was only 69.5%. The shape models generated by RPCA-based ASM and traditional ASM (i.e.
PCA-based ASM) were compared when the training set contained noise samples. Notably
the shape model generated by ASM based on RPCA was consistent with the shape model generated by the traditional ASM when the training set was noiseless. Remarkably
RPCA eliminated the influence of the noise samples on the shape model. Adding PRCA to other lung parenchyma segmentation algorithms generated good results for training sets containing noise samples. The gray threshold method and ASM segmentation method based on RPCA were used to segment the same lung image with juxta-pleural tumor.Notably
the ASM segmentation method based on RPCA generated correct segmentation results in contrast to the gray threshold method.
Conclusion
2
The experimental results showed that a good segmentation result was obtained by the ASM based on RPCA when the noise sample was contained in the training sample set. When the pulmonary parenchyma was absent
some markers were updated to the transition region of the normal lung tissues and tumor rather than to the real lung border during searching.Thus
identifying abnormal markers first is necessary. A new abnormal marker identification method should be designed to provide different searching functions for normal and abnormal markers.
Cheng X. 2013. Nonrigid Face Alignment for Unknown Subject in Video. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology
Cootes T F, Taylor C J, Cooper D H and Graham J. 1995. Active shape models-their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1):38-59[DOI:10.1006/cviu.1995.1004]
Hosseini-Asl E, Zurada J M, Gimel'farb G and El-Baz A. 2016.3-D lung segmentation by incremental constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63(5):952-963[DOI:10.1109/TBME.2015.2482387]
Murphy K, van Ginneken B, Reinhardt J M, Kabus S, Ding K, Deng X, Cao K L, Du K F, Christensen G E, Garcia V, Vercauteren T, Ayache N, Commowick O, Malandain G, Glocker B, Paragios N, Navab N, Gorbunova V, Sporring J, de Bruijne M, Han X, Heinrich M P, Schnabel J A, Jenkinson M, Lorenz C, Modat M, McClelland J R, Ourselin S, Muenzing A E A and Viergever M A. 2011. Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT:the EMPIRE10 challenge. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 30(11):1901-1920[DOI:10.1109/TMI.2011.2158349]
Oluyide O M, Tapamo J R and Viriri S. 2018. Automatic lung segmentation based on graph cut using a distance-constrained energy. IET Computer Vision, 12(5):609-615[DOI:10.1049/iet-cvi.2017.0226]
Peng Y G, Ganesh A, Wright J, Xu W L and Ma Y. 2012. RASL:robust alignment by sparse and low-rank decomposition for linearly correlated images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34(11):2233-2246[DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2011.282]
Qiu F, Hou F, Yuan Y and Wang W C. 2019. Blind image deblurring with reinforced use of edges. Journal of Image and Graphics, 24(6):847-858
邱枫, 侯飞, 袁野, 王文成. 2019.加强边缘感知的盲去模糊算法.中国图象图形学报, 24(6):847-858DOI:10.11834/jig.180543]
Shao Y Q, Gao Y Z, Guo Y R, Shi Y H, Yang X and Shen D G. 2014. Hierarchical lung field segmentation with joint shape and appearance sparse learning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 33(9):1761-1780[DOI:10.1109/TMI.2014.2305691]
Sluimer I, Prokop M and van Ginneken B. 2005. Toward automated segmentation of the pathological lung in CT. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 24(8):1025-1038[DOI:10.1109/TMI.2005.851757]
Sofka M, Wetzl J, Birkbeck N, Zhang J D, Kohlberger T, Kaftan J, Declerck J and Zhou S K. 2011. Multi-stage learning for robust lung segmentation in challenging CT volumes//Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Toronto: Springer: 667-674[ DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_82 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_82 ]
Soliman A, Khalifa F, Elnakib A, El-Ghar M A, Dunlap N, Wang B, Gimel'farb G, Keynton R and El-Baz A. 2017. Accurate lungs segmentation on CT chest images by adaptive appearance-guided shape modeling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36(1):263-276[DOI:10.1109/TMI.2016.2606370]
Sun S H, Bauer C and Beichel R. 2012. Automated 3-D segmentation of lungs with lung cancer in CT data using a novel robust active shape model approach. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 31(2):449-460[DOI:10.1109/TMI.2011.2171357]
Sun S S, Fan L N, Kang Y, Ren H Z and Qi S L. 2016. Research on segmentation method of lung with juxta-pleural tumor based on the improved active shape model. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 33(5):879-884
孙申申, 范立南, 康雁, 任会之, 齐守良. 2016.基于改进主动形状模型的含胸壁粘连型肿块的肺区分割方法研究.生物医学工程学杂志, 33(5):879-884DOI:10.7507/1001-5515.20160142]
van Ginneken B, Frangi A F, Staal J J, ter Haar Romeny B M and Viergever M A. 2002. Active shape model segmentation with optimal features. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(8):924-933[DOI:10.1109/TMI.2002.803121]
Wang G T, Zhang S T, Li F and Gu L X. 2013. A new segmentation framework based on sparse shape composition in liver surgery planning system. Medical Physics, 40(5):051913[DOI:10.1118/1.4802215]
Wright J, Peng Y G, Ma Y, Ganesh A and Rao S. 2009. Robust principal component analysis: exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices by convex optimization//Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver: Curran Associates Inc.: 2080-2088
Yang H, Cai S N, Wang J D and Quan L. 2014. Low-rank SIFT: an affine invariant feature for place recognition//Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Paris: IEEE: 5731-5735[ DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2014.7026159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2014.7026159 ]
Zhang S T, Zhan Y Q, Dewan M, Huang J Z, Metaxas D M and Zhou X S. 2012. Towards robust and effective shape modeling:sparse shape composition. Medical Image Analysis, 16(1):265-277[DOI:10.1016/j.media.2011.08.004]
Zhou X W, Yang C, Zhao H Y and Yu W C. 2014. Low-rank modeling and its applications in image analysis. ACM Computing Surveys, (CSUR), 47(2):1-33[DOI:10.1145/2674559]
Zhou X W and YU W C.2013. Low-rank modeling and its application in medical image analysis. Proc. SPIE 8750, Independent Component Analyses, Compressive Sampling, Wavelets, Neural Net, Biosystems, and Nanoengineering XI, 87500V, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2017684 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2017684
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621