结合流形密度的聚集行为模式分割算法
Collective motion pattern segmentation algorithm based on manifold density
- 2019年24卷第5期 页码:734-743
收稿:2018-07-04,
修回:2018-9-6,
纸质出版:2019-05-16
DOI: 10.11834/jig.180412
移动端阅览

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
收稿:2018-07-04,
修回:2018-9-6,
纸质出版:2019-05-16
移动端阅览
目的
2
在视频监控和人群模式行为理解的重要应用中,识别分割场景中的集体行为仍然是一个极具挑战性的问题。在这项研究中,提出一种基于流形密度的集体聚类算法,能够识别具有任意形状和不同密度条件下的集体行为的局部和全局模式。
方法
2
受群体运动行为的流形拓扑结构启发,首先提出一种新的流形距离度量方式用于挖掘群体运动的深层行为模式。进一步定义了集体聚集密度的概念,并通过基于聚集密度的聚类算法识别具有局部一致性行为的群组,这种策略更适用于识别具有任意形状的聚类。同时考虑到子群组之间的复杂交互作用,引入层次聚集合并算法得到全局集体行为模式,可以有效地表征全局一致性关系。
结果
2
针对不同情况下的复杂场景,本文算法在集体视频监控数据集下的实验结果表明了其有效性和鲁棒性,相比于传统的聚类方法和标准经典算法,以平均误差(AD)和方差(VAR)作为评价指标来评价算法性能,本文方法将识别分割聚集行为群组的误差率结果控制在了0.81和0.99以内,相比许多经典方法有较大提升。同时在具有复杂流形结构及任意密度条件下的人群场景中能够取得精确有效的识别结果,解决了经典方法在该特殊场景下存在的缺点。
结论
2
本文针对已有方法在流形结构场景识别集体行为流向缺乏精确性和稳定性的描述和分析这一问题,提出了基于流形密度的群组聚集聚类识别算法,在多个复杂真实视频数据集中进行实验,证明了所提方法的有效性,并相比于已有方法具有更高的识别精度。
Objective
2
Collective motion detection is fundamentally important for analyzing crowd behavior and has attracted considerable attention in artificial intelligence. The recognition and segmentation of collective behavior are important branches of computer vision and graphics
which are significant for public safety
intelligent traffic
and architectural design. The main task of recognizing collective behavior is to mine the coherent patterns consisting of highly coherent tracklets according to the extracted features from crowd motion in videos. However
existing works mostly have limitations due to the insufficient utilization of crowd properties and the arbitrary processing of individuals. Collective behavior involves local and global motion patterns
in which varying densities and arbitrary shapes are salient characteristics. The global coherent motion with complex interaction requires an accurate measurement of local coherency and analysis of global continuity. A further study demonstrates that the motion descriptor and similarity measurement remain limited to finding the latent relativity among tracklet points under the circumstances of perspective distortion and large spatial gap. In view of these shortcomings
we propose the density-based manifold collective clustering approach for detecting groups in crowd scenes.
Method
2
Our background modeling is based on the clustering strategy and aims to recognize arbitrarily shaped clusters in coherent motion. Motion features are detected with the generalized Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi feature point tracker
which jointly combines the detecting and tracking stages with efficient computation. The corresponding algorithms mainly include manifold collective density definition
density-based manifold collective clustering
and hierarchical collectiveness merging process. In the first process
a new manifold distance metric is presented to express the intrinsic characteristics of moving individuals. A collective density with novelty is defined based on this topological structure to describe the collectiveness between an individual and its neighbors. This collective density represents the local density efficiently
reflects the global consistency
and is highly adaptive to reveal the underlying patterns of varying densities in coherent motion. We propose a novel collective clustering to find a local topological relationship that can precisely recognize the collectiveness relationship between points and their surroundings. Similar to the core idea of fast search and density peak cluster method
the cluster peak centers of subgroups are assumed to be characterized by a higher collective density calculated by collectiveness than their neighbors. The density-based manifold collective clustering approach is proposed to detect local and global coherent motions with arbitrary shapes and varying densities. Three salient properties must not be ignored:1) the accurate identification of outliers and exploration of manifold structure
2) the automatic decision of group number without involving any arbitrary threshold
and 3) the capability of dealing with crowd scenes with varying densities. Thus
in the proposed method
the center of collective subgroups is characterized by two criteria:one is a higher collective density than its neighbors
and the other is a relatively large distance and inconsistent orientation from points with a higher density. From this view
the clustering method can determine the cluster centers automatically. In the recognition of global consistency part
inspired by the main ideology of the BIRCH clustering method
a hierarchical collectiveness merging strategy is developed to combine local motions and recognize global consistency. In this process
the collectiveness is used to capture the intracorrelations of subgroups
and local clusters are successfully combined into global coherent groups by merging the highly consistent pairwise subgroups iteratively.
Result
2
Collective Motion Database is employed to evaluate the experimental performance
and four state-of-the-art group detection techniques are used for comparison
namely
coherent filtering
collective transition
measuring crowd collectiveness
and collective density clustering. Results show that in complex scenes under different conditions
the experimental results of the algorithm remain highly effective and robust. Compared with the traditional clustering methods and state-of-the-art algorithms
average difference (AD) and variance (VAR) are used as criteria to evaluate the algorithm performance. The AD rate of our proposed method is controlled within 0.81
and the VAR rate is under 0.99
which is approximately 6% lower than those of classical clustering methods. Compared with such classical methods
our method exhibits great improvement. Accurate and effective recognition results can be obtained in crowd scenes with complex manifold structures and arbitrary density conditions
which solve the shortcomings of the classical methods in this special scenario.
Conclusion
2
This study proposes a cluster aggregation clustering algorithm based on manifold density for multiple complex real-world videos based on the manifold description and analysis of existing methods for identifying the lack of accuracy and stability of collective behavioral flow in manifold structures. Experiments on various real-world videos and comparisons with previous works validate that our method yields substantial boosts over state-of-the-art competitors. Therefore
the proposed algorithm can have a preferable adaptive performance in complex scenes with varying densities and arbitrary shape situations.
Li T, Chang H, Wang M, et al. Crowded scene analysis:a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2015, 25(3):367-386.[DOI:10.1109/TCSVT.2014.2358029]
Li W X, Mahadevan V, Vasconcelos N. Anomaly detection and localization in crowded scenes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2014, 36(1):18-32.[DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2013.111]
Rabaud V, Belongie S. Counting crowded moving objects[C ] //Proceedings of 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. New York, USA: IEEE, 2006: 705-711.[ DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2006.92 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2006.92 ]
Ali S, Shah M. Floor fields for tracking in high density crowd scenes[C ] //Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer Vision. Marseille, France: Springer, 2008: 1-14.[ DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88688-4_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88688-4_1 ]
Kratz L, Nishino K. Tracking pedestrians using local spatio-temporal motion patterns in extremely crowded scenes[J]. IEEE Transactions onPattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012, 34(5):987-1002.[DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2011.173]
Ge W N, Collins R T, Ruback R B. Vision-based analysis of small groups in pedestrian crowds[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012, 34(5):1003-1016.[DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2011.176]
Ali S, Shah M. A lagrangian particle dynamics approach for crowd flow segmentation and stability analysis[C ] //Proceedings of 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Minneapolis, USA: IEEE, 2007: 1-6.[ DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2007.382977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2007.382977 ]
Hu M, Ali S, Shah M. Detecting global motion patterns in complex videos[C ] //Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on P attern Recognition. Tampa, FL, USA: IEEE, 2008: 1-5.[ DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.2008.4760950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2008.4760950 ]
Saleemi I, Hartung L, Shah M. Scene understanding by statistical modeling of motion patterns[C ] //Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE, 2010: 2069-2076.[ DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539884 ]
Zhou B L, Wang X G, Tang X O. Random field topic model for semantic region analysis in crowded scenes from tracklets[C ] //Proceedings of CVPR 2011. Colorado Springs, CO, USA: IEEE, 2011: 3441-3448.[ DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995459 ]
Wang C J, Zhao X, Shou Z, et al. A discriminative tracklets representation for crowd analysis[C ] //Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Quebec City, Canada: IEEE, 2015: 1805-1809.[ DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351112 ]
Zhou B L, Tang X O, Zhang H P, et al. Measuring crowd collectiveness[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2014, 36(8):1586-1599.[DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2300484]
Shao J, Loy C C, Wang X G. Scene-independent group profiling in crowd[C ] //Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Columbus, OH, USA: IEEE, 2014: 2227-2234.[ DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2014.285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2014.285 ]
Li X L, Chen M L, Wang Q. Measuring collectiveness via refined topological similarity[J]. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 2016, 12(2):#34.[DOI:10.1145/2854000]
Zhou B L, Tang X O, Wang X G. Coherent filtering: detecting coherent motions from crowd clutters[C ] //Proceedingsof the 12th European Conference on Computer Vision. Florence, Italy: Springer, 2012: 857-871.[ DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_61 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_61 ]
Wu Y P, Ye Y D, Zhao C Y. Coherent motion detection with collective density clustering[C ] //Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Brisbane, Australia: ACM, 2015: 361-370.[ DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2806227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2733373.2806227 ]
Rodriguez A, Laio A. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6191):1492-1496.[DOI:10.1126/science.1242072]
Maier M, Hein M, von Luxburg U. Optimal construction of $$k$$ -nearest-neighbor graphs for identifying noisy clusters[J ] . Theoretical Computer Science, 2009, 410(19):1749-1764.[DOI:10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.009 ]
Wu S, Wong H S. Crowd motion partitioning in a scattered motion field[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 2012, 42(5):1443-1454.[DOI:10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2192267]
Tenenbaum J B, de Silva V, Langford J C. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction[J]. Science, 2000, 290(5500):2319-2323.[DOI:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319]
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621