SAR图像目标识别的卷积神经网模型
Convolution neural network model for SAR image target recognition
- 2018年23卷第11期 页码:1733-1741
收稿:2018-03-13,
修回:2018-6-20,
纸质出版:2018-11-16
DOI: 10.11834/jig.180119
移动端阅览

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
收稿:2018-03-13,
修回:2018-6-20,
纸质出版:2018-11-16
移动端阅览
目的
2
合成孔径雷达图像目标识别可以有效提高合成孔径雷达数据的利用效率。针对合成孔径雷达图像目标识别滤波处理耗时长、识别精度不高的问题,本文提出一种卷积神经网络模型应用于合成孔径雷达图像目标识别。
方法
2
首先,针对合成孔径雷达图像特点设计特征提取部分的网络结构;其次,代价函数中引入L2范数提高模型的抗噪性能和泛化性;再次,全连接层使用Dropout减小网络的运算量并提高泛化性;最后研究了滤波对于网络模型的收敛速度和准确率的影响。
结果
2
实验使用美国运动和静止目标获取与识别数据库,10类目标识别的实验结果表明改进后的卷积神经网络整体识别率(包含变体)由93.76%提升至98.10%。通过设置4组对比实验说明网络结构的改进和优化的有效性。卷积神经网络噪声抑制实验验证了卷积神经网络的特征提取过程对于SAR图像相干斑噪声有抑制作用,可以省去耗时的滤波处理。
结论
2
本文提出的卷积神经网络模型提高了网络的准确率、泛化性,无需耗时的滤波处理,是一种合成孔径雷达图像目标识别的有效方法。
Objective
2
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is an important means of earth observation considering its all-weather
day-and-night
and penetrating imaging capabilities. SAR has been extensively used in battlefield detection and intelligence acquisition. SAR is a kind of electromagnetic wave coherent imaging system. A SAR image not only has variability but also has a strong speckle noise
which leads to considerable difficulties in target recognition of a SAR image. A manual interpretation of numerous SAR image data is difficult given the diversity of SAR image acquisition methods. A SAR automatic target recognition can effectively improve the utilization efficiency of SAR image data. However
the current SAR image target recognition algorithm has two main problems. First
the characteristics of target recognition
such as edge
corner
contour
texture
and other low-level features
are not representative. Second
in the traditional SAR image target recognition method
an effective filtering algorithm is crucial
but the filtering process is time-consuming. A convolutional neural network model is presented in this study to solve the problems of time-consuming filtering process and low recognition accuracy in the SAR target recognition.
Method
2
First
a network structure of the feature extraction part was specifically designed for the characteristics of SAR images
which are slightly different from optical images. We must design a reasonable network structure for the characteristics of SAR images. First
a SAR image that reflects a target radar echo intensity is a gray image because the feature information is less in a SAR image than in an optical image. Second
speckle noise inevitably exists in the SAR image. Third
the pixel size of the target is small because of the resolution limitation of the SAR image. Owing to the characteristics of SAR images
the convolutional neural network applied to SAR image target recognition must use a small convolution kernel and an appropriate convolution layer number. The feature extraction part of the proposed convolutional neural network model consists of four convolutional layers
four nonlinear layers
and two pooling layers. Second
an L2 norm was introduced to the cost function to improve the anti-noise and generalization performances of the model. Theoretical deduction shows the means by which the L2 norm enhances the noise immunity and generalization performance of the model. Third
Dropout reduced the computational complexity of the network and improved the generalization performance of the model. Dropout is a regularization technique for the reduction of overfitting in neural networks by preventing complex co-adaptations in training data. Dropout is an efficient technique for conducting model averaging with neural networks. Finally
the influence of filtering on the convergence speed and accuracy of the network was investigated. In the traditional SAR image target recognition method
the effective filtering algorithm is crucial
but the filtering process is time-consuming.
Result
2
Experimental data were obtained from the United States Moving and Stationary Target Acquisition and Recognition database. Experimental results of 10 types of target recognition showed that the overall recognition rate (including the variant) of the improved convolutional neural network increased from 93.76% to 98.10%. The improved feature extraction network structure extracts effective target features
thus improving the accuracy of the model. The accuracy of target variant recognition in SAR images had also been considerably improved. Notably
L2 regularization and Dropout enhanced the generalization performance of the model. Different sets of comparative experiments were set up to illustrate the effectiveness of improving and optimizing the network structure. The accuracy rate decreased from 98.10% to 97.06% when the first layer uses a 9×9 convolution kernel instead of two cascaded 5×5 convolution kernels. The accuracy of network identification increases from 94.91% to 96.19% when using L2 regularization
thereby indicating that L2 regularization can effectively improve the accuracy of network identification. Dropout increases the fluctuation range of the recognition rate
thus increasing the recognition accuracy to the highest level. Noise suppression experiments on the convolutional neural network were conducted to analyze the effects of three filtering methods
namely
Lee
bilateral
and Gamma MAP (Maximum A Posteriori)
on the training process and results of the model. The experiments verified that the feature extraction process of the convolutional neural network can suppress the speckle noise of the SAR image and can save time during the filtering process. The filtering process consumes additional time
does not improve the convergence speed of convolutional neural network training
and decreases the recognition accuracy because it may filter out effective target recognition features
such as target texture
thus resulting in a decrease in recognition accuracy.
Conclusion
2
The convolutional neural network model proposed in this study improves the accuracy and generalization of the network
does not require a time-consuming filtering process
and is an effective method for target recognition of SAR images.
Jia X Y, Lu L J. Survey on synthetic aperture radar technology[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Information Science Edition, 2015, 33(4):373-379.
贾新宇, 路来君.合成孔径雷达技术研究综述[J].吉林大学学报:信息科学版, 2015, 33(4):373-379. [DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-5896.2015.04.005]
Zhang X Z, Liu Z Y, Liu S J, et al. Sparse coding of 2D-slice Zernike moments for SAR ATR[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, 38(2):412-431.[DOI:10.1080/01431161.2016.1266107]
Ross T D, Worrell S W, Velten V J, et al. Standard SAR ATR evaluation experiments using the MSTAR public release data set[C]//Proceedings Volume 3370, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery V. Orlando, FL, United States: SPIE, 1998, 3370: 566-573.[ DOI:10.1117/12.321859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.321859 ]
Zhang R, Hong J, Ming F. SAR ATR algorithm based on CSAR raw echo modeling[J]. Journal of Electronics&Information Technology, 2011, 33(1):27-32.
张锐, 洪峻, 明峰.基于目标CSAR回波模型的SAR自动目标识别算法[J].电子与信息学报, 2011, 33(1):27-32. [DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1146.2010.00192]
Wang S X, He Z G. The fast target recognition approach based on PCA features for SAR images[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2008, 30(3):136-140.
王世晞, 贺志国.基于PCA特征的快速SAR图像目标识别方法[J].国防科技大学学报, 2008, 30(3):136-140. [DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-2486.2008.03.027]
Huan R H, Zhang P, Pan Y. SAR target recognition using PCA, ICA and Gabor wavelet decision fusion[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2012, 16(2):262-274.
宦若虹, 张平, 潘赟. PCA、ICA和Gabor小波决策融合的SAR目标识别[J].遥感学报, 2012, 16(2):262-274. [DOI:10.11834/jrs.20120457]
Zhao Q, Princi各班长班务会上统计一下假期的好人好事, 统计完毕后微信发给我, 没有的话也说一声收到回复pe J C. Support vector machines for SAR automatic target recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2001, 37(2): 643-654.[ DOI:10.1109/7.937475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/7.937475 ]
Wang Y, Han P, Lu X G, et al. The performance comparison of adaboost and SVM applied to SAR ATR[C]//Proceedings of 2006 CIE International Conference on Radar. Shanghai, China: IEEE, 2007: 1-4.[ DOI:10.1109/ICR.2006.343515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICR.2006.343515 ]
Sun Y J, Liu Z P, Todorovic S, et al. Adaptive boosting for SAR automatic target recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2007, 43(1):112-125.[DOI:10.1109/TAES.2007.357120]
Yang Z Y, Lin W, Yan W D, et al. SAR Image target recognition based on heat kernel co-occurrence matrix[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2016, 34(2):356-361.
杨中悦, 林伟, 延伟东, 等.基于热核共生矩阵的SAR图像纹理目标识别[J].西北工业大学学报, 2016, 34(2):356-361. [DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2016.02.028]
Yang X F, Lin W, Yan W D, et al. SAR image target recognition based on heat kernel[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2014, 43(11):3794-3801.
杨绪峰, 林伟, 延伟东, 等.采用热核特征的SAR图像目标识别[J].红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(11):3794-3801. [DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2014.11.050]
Tian Z Z, Zhan R H, Hu J M, et al. SAR ATR based on convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(3):320-325.
田壮壮, 占荣辉, 胡杰民, 等.基于卷积神经网络的SAR图像目标识别研究[J].雷达学报, 2016, 5(3):320-325. [DOI:10.12000/JR16037]
Lecun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86(11):2278-2324.[DOI:10.1109/5.726791]
Xiao S P, Yang Y, Feng D J, et al. Contrastive analysis of the performances of radar polarimetric detectors[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2014, 35(10):1198-1203.
肖顺平, 杨勇, 冯德军, 等.雷达极化检测器性能对比分析[J].宇航学报, 2014, 35(10):1198-1203. [DOI:10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2014.10.013]
Hinton G E, Srivastava N, Krizhevsky A, et al. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1207.0580, 2012
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621